The Economist praises Lessons from Deregulation as "Excellent reading ... assaulting the widely held view that America's deregulation of airlines and telecoms has been a terrible failure" (Dec. 4, 2003).
Over the last several years, the value of stocks in both the airline and the telecommunications industries have dropped catastrophically. Since these industries were among the most important?and most visible?to have been unleashed from regulation in recent decades (albeit in widely differing degree), their wrenching experience has understandably raised the question of whether their deregulation should be reconsidered or even reversed.
The airlines were comprehensively deregulated in 1978 in one bold stroke, and six years later the government apparatus for controlling domestic fares and routes was abolished. The telecommunications industry is in the midst of a parallel initiative, but one that is both more gradual and more complex. In common, however, is positive evidence of the advantages of open competition over direct comprehensive regulation.
Alfred E. Kahn, one of the foremost authorities on deregulation, argues in this book that every passing year demonstrates the superiority of the road chosen for the airlines. He contrasts the financial meltdowns of these two industries with others taking place at the same time, particularly in technology-related stocks and ?dot.coms,? pointing out that these sectors were also relatively free of direct economic regulation. Their experience provides a useful counter to the natural tendency to blame all the woes of aviation and telecommunications on government policy.
This book provides a valuable and accessible guide to unraveling the complex world of network deregulation. It will serve as a reference point for practioners and policymakers, as well as an important introduction for the general public, written by one of the masters of the field.
(Purchase a hard-copy version of this book.)
|
| |
Post comments
|
View all comments
|
|
To get the documentation
|
|
Comment by:
Mimi |
|
Pleace let sent me the documentation about learne the building....
|
|
|
|
Line sharing
|
|
Comment by:
Dirk Diggler |
|
Adopting mandatory line-sharing in the telco world but not in the cable world is a striking asymmetry, particulary in light of cable's majority share of broadband subs. If th...
|
|
|
|
UNE-P
|
|
Comment by:
Cem Celebiler |
|
In response to my posting, "Dirk" grants that there is a case for line sharing and line unbundling using the essential facilities argument, but claims that UNE-P is much broad...
|
|
|
|
UNE-P( ...)
|
|
Comment by:
Dirk Diggler |
|
I do not follow the previous poster's conclusion. First, he asserts that the local loop is an essential facility. Lets assume, for arguments sake that he is correct. Second...
|
|
|
|
Natural Monopoly and the risks of Vertical integration
|
|
Comment by:
Cem Celebiler |
|
The author does not address the issue of whether last mile access for much of the country is a natural monopoly (or duopoly) or not. Claiming that facilities based competitio...
|
|
|